Konstruksi Kebenaran dalam Evidence-Based Policy Making: Analisis Wacana Kritis atas Kebijakan Penanggulangan Kemiskinan di Provinsi Banten

https://doi.org/10.56113/takuana.v4i4.346

Authors

Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta, Indonesia
×

Eko Supriatno

Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta, Indonesia

Eko Supriatno adalah mahasiswa Program Doktor Administrasi Publik Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta.

Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta, Indonesia
×

Fahd Pahdepie

Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta, Indonesia

Fahd Pahdepie adalah mahasiswa Program Doktor Administrasi Publik Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta.

Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta, Indonesia
×

Rahmat Salam

Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta, Indonesia

Rahmat Salam adalah dosen di Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta, yang mengkhususkan diri dalam bidang Ilmu Administrasi Publik, dan filsafat ilmu.

 

Scopus ID: 57852602800

Orchid ID: 0000-0002-5059-7787

Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=603zQ10AAAAJ

Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta, Indonesia
×

Andriansyah Andriansyah

Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta, Indonesia

Andriansyah adalah Guru Besar dan Ketua Program Studi Doktor Administrasi Publik (DAP) di Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta, yang mengkhususkan diri dalam bidang Ilmu Administrasi Publik.

 

Scopus ID: 57207806732

Orchid ID: 0000-0002-1146-4826

Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=SUr_MEEAAAAJ

Abstract

Evidence-Based Policy Making (EBPM) is often presented as a rational and objective policy ideal, yet evidence is not neutral; it is constructed through power relations, interests, and epistemic frameworks. Using Critical Discourse Analysis grounded in social constructivism and Michel Foucault’s theory of power, this study examines poverty alleviation policy in Provinsi Banten. The analysis draws on provincial planning documents (RPJMD/RPD and RKPD), Bappeda Provinsi Banten policy documents, and BPS poverty releases and press statements. Findings identify a recurring EBPM discourse that privileges macro indicators and performance metrics to narrate “progress,” while marginalizing intra-provincial inequality and contested definitions of “the poor.” Evidence therefore does not “speak for itself” but is mediated by values, policy paradigms, and dominant actors’ interests. The article argues for EBPM that integrates ethical and epistemological reflexivity and local context so policy is not only scientific but also fair and inclusive.

Keywords


Evidence-Based Policy Making, Truth Construction, Critical Discourse Analysis, Philosophy of Science, Poverty Alleviation Policy

Author Biographies

Eko Supriatno, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

Eko Supriatno adalah mahasiswa Program Doktor Administrasi Publik Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta.

Fahd Pahdepie, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

Fahd Pahdepie adalah mahasiswa Program Doktor Administrasi Publik Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta.

Rahmat Salam, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

Rahmat Salam adalah dosen di Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta, yang mengkhususkan diri dalam bidang Ilmu Administrasi Publik, dan filsafat ilmu.

 

Scopus ID: 57852602800

Orchid ID: 0000-0002-5059-7787

Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=603zQ10AAAAJ

Andriansyah Andriansyah, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

Andriansyah adalah Guru Besar dan Ketua Program Studi Doktor Administrasi Publik (DAP) di Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta, yang mengkhususkan diri dalam bidang Ilmu Administrasi Publik.

 

Scopus ID: 57207806732

Orchid ID: 0000-0002-1146-4826

Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=SUr_MEEAAAAJ

References

Bacchi, C., & Goodwin, S. (2016). Poststructural policy analysis: A guide to practice. Palgrave Macmillan.

Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Provinsi Banten. (2022). Rencana penanggulangan kemiskinan daerah (RPKD) Provinsi Banten 2022–2026.

Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Provinsi Banten. (2024). Laporan capaian indeks pembangunan manusia Banten 2020–2023.

Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1991). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Penguin Books.

Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Banten. (2023). Profil kemiskinan di Provinsi Banten Maret 2023. https://banten.bps.go.id

Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional. (2023). Laporan kinerja instansi pemerintah (LKjIP) BRIN 2022.

Cairney, P. (2016). The politics of evidence-based policy making. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford University Press.

Cairns, G. (2019). Evidence-based policy: A philosophical critique. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 25(6), 1045–1051.

Fairclough, N. (2015). Language and power (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Fairclough, N. (2024). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Fischer, F. (2019). Knowledge politics and public policy in the post-truth era. Palgrave Macmillan.

Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge University Press.

Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. Pantheon Books.

French, S. (2019). Evidence-based policy: A philosophical critique. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 25(6), 1045–1051.

Gabby, M. T. (2023). Audit kebijakan dan konstruksi bukti dalam layanan kesehatan. Jurnal Kebijakan Kesehatan Indonesia, 12(1), 1–15.

Head, B. W. (2022). Politics, policy and evidence. Oxford University Press.

Janks, H. (2022). Critical discourse analysis sebagai metodologi dalam penelitian kebijakan. Jurnal Metodologi Pendidikan, 5(2), 45–58.

Kementerian Sosial Republik Indonesia. (2022). Laporan evaluasi terpadu penanggulangan kemiskinan berbasis kearifan lokal.

Koopman, C. (2013). Genealogy as critique: Foucault and the problems of modernity. Indiana University Press.

Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions (50th anniversary ed.). University of Chicago Press.

Lentari, S. (2024a). Kontestasi rasionalitas dalam kebijakan kemiskinan di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Politik, 27(1), 1–20.

Lentari, S. (2024b). Paradoks kebijakan kemiskinan: Antara statistik dan realita daerah. Jurnal Sosiologi, 29(1), 1–18.

Lorenzini, D. (2023). Foucault, regime of truth, and the history of the present. Angelaki, 28(1), 120–135.

Marston, G., & Watts, R. (2003). Tampering with the evidence: A critical appraisal of evidence-based policy-making. The Drawing Board: An Australian Review of Public Affairs, 3(3), 143–163.

Newman, J. (2017). The politics of evidence in public administration. Public Administration Review, 77(2), 211–218.

Nugroho, A. (2021). Analisis wacana kritis pada dokumen kebijakan publik di Indonesia. Jurnal Politik dan Pemerintahan, 14(2), 1–15.

Nutley, S. M. (2023). Using evidence: What works? Policy Press.

Oliver, K., Lorenc, T., & Innvaer, S. (2014). The use of evidence in public policy: A review of reviews. Evidence & Policy, 10(1), 3–35.

Olssen, M. (2021). Biopolitical power and evidence-based policy. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 53(12), 1173–1185.

Parkhurst, J. (2017). The politics of evidence: From evidence-based policy to the good governance of evidence. Routledge.

Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 78 Tahun 2021 tentang Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional.

Pusat Penelitian Badan Keahlian DPR RI. (2020). Prosiding seminar nasional: Evidence-based policy making dalam fungsi legislasi.

Safitri, A., et al. (2022). Analisis kebijakan penanggulangan kemiskinan di Indonesia: Tantangan dan harapan. Jurnal Kebijakan Publik, 13(1), 45–58.

Salam, R., & Andriansyah. (2023). Kritis atas evidence-based policy: Menyingkap relasi kuasa dalam kebijakan. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 15(1), 1–20.

Saltelli, A., & Giampietro, M. (2017). What is wrong with evidence-based policy, and how can it be improved? Futures, 91, 62–71.

Smith, K. E. (2021). Beyond evidence-based policy: The politics of ideas. Policy & Politics, 49(1), 3–22.

Smith, K. E., & Stewart, E. (2020). We need to talk about politics: Addressing the neglect of politics in evidence-based policy. Evidence & Policy, 16(1), 109–127.

Strassheim, H. (2017). Politics and policy expertise: Towards a political epistemology. Evidence & Policy, 13(4), 667–686.

Strassheim, H. (2020). The rise of evidence-based policy and the role of expertise. In Handbook of public policy.

Widiatmaka, P. (2023). Relasi kuasa-pengetahuan dalam kebijakan pendidikan: Perspektif Michel Foucault. Jurnal Filsafat, 33(1), 1–20.

Yuningsih, N. Y., & Komala, R. (2021). Implementasi evidence-based policy making dalam pembangunan daerah di Indonesia. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 12(2), 1–18.

Downloads

Full Text Download

Published

February 19, 2026

How to Cite

Supriatno, E., Pahdepie, F., Salam, R., & Andriansyah, A. (2026). Konstruksi Kebenaran dalam Evidence-Based Policy Making: Analisis Wacana Kritis atas Kebijakan Penanggulangan Kemiskinan di Provinsi Banten. Takuana: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains, Dan Humaniora, 4(4), 1814–1824. https://doi.org/10.56113/takuana.v4i4.346

License


Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

All published content in Takuana: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains, dan Humaniora is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY NC SA 4.0). This license allows others to share, copy, redistribute, and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, as long as proper credit is given to the original author(s) and source, and any derivative works are distributed under the same license.

Attribution must include a clear citation of the original work and a statement indicating whether any changes were made. Commercial use is not permitted under this license and there is no additional legal or technological restrictions may be applied. For more information about the license terms and permissible use, please refer to the full license text available here.