Epistemologi Fungsional C.A. van Peursen: Rekonstruksi Makna Ilmu di Tengah Krisis Objektivitas Modern

https://doi.org/10.56113/takuana.v4i3.187

Authors

Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Indonesia
×

Amri Saputra

Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Indonesia
×

Lutfiah Holifa Balkis

Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Indonesia
×

Winda Islamitha Nurhamidah

Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Indonesia
×

Rofiatus Sa'adah

Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Indonesia
×

Ansorul Alim

Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Indonesia
×

Usman

Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Abstract

The crisis of objectivity in modern science reveals a profound epistemological problem in which scientific rationality becomes detached from ethical and human dimensions. Science, which was originally intended to liberate humanity, has often turned into a technocratic instrument that alienates it. This article aims to reconstruct the meaning of science through the perspective of C.A. van Peursen’s functional epistemology as a philosophical response to the modern crisis of objectivity. The study employs a qualitative approach using a philosophical-hermeneutic analysis to interpret Van Peursen’s ideas within the broader context of culture and contemporary knowledge dynamics. Data were collected from Van Peursen’s primary works and relevant secondary sources, then analyzed through three stages: descriptive-conceptual mapping, critical analysis, and philosophical reconstruction. The findings indicate that Van Peursen’s functional epistemology positions science as a dynamic and value-laden cultural strategy rather than a value-free system. Science is not merely a tool for empirical verification but also a means of restoring human meaning and moral purpose. The study contributes to developing a more humanistic, dialogical, and context-sensitive philosophy of science that integrates scientific rationality, local wisdom, and ethical responsibility within the Indonesian intellectual landscape.

Keywords


C.A. van Peursen, cultural strategy, functional epistemology, humanism, objectivity crisis, philosophy of science

References

Arifin, Z., Maragustam, M., Muqowim, M., & ‘Aziz, H. (2021). The kiai’s cultural strategy in shaping the religious culture of the community of Temboro Magetan Village, East Java. Dinamika Ilmu, 21(2), 369–381. https://doi.org/10.21093/di.v21i2.3657

Asmawi, A., & Alam, M. S. (2024). Qualitative research: Understanding its underlying philosophies. Forum for Education Studies, 2(2), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.59400/fes.v2i2.1320

Barokah, R., Melisya, S., & Clarisyah, A. A. (2025). Evolusi cara berpikir manusia: Kontribusi pemikiran Auguste Comte dan C. A. Van Peursen.

Blancke, S. (2022). Science as a moral system. Synthese, 200(6), 454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03877-7

Colombo, M., Gervais, R., & Sprenger, J. (2017). Introduction: Objectivity in science. Synthese, 194(12), 4641–4642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1582-x

Constantin, N., & Sitorus, F. (2024). Hermeneutika, makna, dan komunikasi dalam perspektif Hans-Georg Gadamer. SOSFILKOM: Jurnal Sosial, Filsafat dan Komunikasi, 18(1), 74–82. https://doi.org/10.32534/jsfk.v18i1.5241

Dony, A. R., & Daffa, M. (2024). Tinjauan kritis filsafat kebudayaan Van Peursen dalam nuansa magis upacara Labuhan Yogyakarta. Satwika: Kajian Ilmu Budaya dan Perubahan Sosial, 8(1), 184–198. https://doi.org/10.22219/satwika.v8i1.30859

Fuster Guillen, D. E. (2019). Qualitative research: Hermeneutical phenomenological method. Propósitos y Representaciones: Journal of Educational Psychology, 7(1), 201–229. https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2019.v7n1.267

Green, B. (2021). The contestation of tech ethics: A sociotechnical approach to technology ethics in practice. Journal of Social Computing, 2(3), 209–225. https://doi.org/10.23919/jsc.2021.0018

Hiko, A. M. (2020). Is science rational: Critical analysis on Thomas Kuhn’s objectivity, value judgment and theory choice and Harvey Siegel’s inquiry concerning the rationality of science. International Journal of Philosophy, 8(3), 61. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20200803.11

Matta, C. (2021). Philosophical paradigms in qualitative research methods education: What is their pedagogical role? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 66(6), 1049–1062. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2021.1958372

Pipere, A., & Mārtinsone, K. (2023). Shaping an image of science in the 21st century: The perspective of metamodernism. Societies, 13(12), 254. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc13120254

Putri, I. S. (2021). Pengaruh budaya menurut C. A. Van Peursen dalam tinjauan filsafat pada kultur Indonesia [Skripsi, Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi]. Repositori Universitas Panca Budi. https://eprints.pancabudi.ac.id/id/eprint/763/

Qomarudin, A., Maslahah, & Maulida, A. Z. (2022). Mystical, ontological, and functionalist according to Cornelis Anthonie Van Peursen in the theory of philosophy of science. SOSMANIORA: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 1(4), 549–556. https://doi.org/10.55123/sosmaniora.v1i4.1088

Rasyid, A. (2018). Mistik, ontologis, dan fungsional (Budaya hukum Islam: A new perspective). Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 15(01), 40–57. https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v15i01.378

Rolin, K. H. (2021). Objectivity, trust and social responsibility. Synthese, 199(1–2), 513–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02669-1

Stamenkovic, P. (2023). Facts and objectivity in science. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 48(2), 277–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2022.2150807

Sudarsih, S. (2020). Metaphysic dimension in Labuhan Ceremony of Yogyakarta Palace. E3S Web of Conferences, 202, 07051. (The 5th International Conference on Energy, Environmental and Information System - ICENIS 2020). https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202020207051

Sudrajat, S., Ma’ruf, H. M., Sudrajat, A., & Damayanti, S. N. (2019). Epistemologi Thomas S. Kuhn dan munculnya ilmu pengetahuan sosial. JIPSINDO, 6(1), 25–45. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipsindo.v6i1.24329

Sugeng, S., Fitriana, D., & Aidy, W. R. (2024). Pendekatan kebudayaan dalam membangun ketahanan dan keamanan insani: Sebuah kajian strategis. (2024). Jurnal Keamanan Nasional, 10(2), 263-294. https://doi.org/10.31599/2ay4k921

Tan, J. (2022). The alienation of science and technology from the perspective of labor alienation logic: Taking the creation and application of Metaverse as an example. Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(10), 160–165. https://doi.org/10.54691/fhss.v2i10.2430

Tanudirjo, D. A. (2017). Reflection on the production of knowledge: From postmodernism to pseudoscience. Humaniora, 29(1), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.22559

Wenqing, W. (2022). On the future of science and technology and science ethics. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 15(2), 616–623. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2022.15.2.0861

Zulfa, N. I., & Usman. (2025). Metodologi ilmiah sebagai dasar pengembangan pendidikan Islam kontekstual: Perspektif filsafat C. A. Van Peursen. At-Thullab: Jurnal Mahasiswa Studi Islam, 7(2), 372–384. https://doi.org/10.20885/tullab.vol7.iss2.art11

Downloads

Full Text Download

Published

November 14, 2025

How to Cite

Saputra, A., Holifa Balkis, L., Nurhamidah, W. I., Sa’adah, R., Alim, A., & Usman. (2025). Epistemologi Fungsional C.A. van Peursen: Rekonstruksi Makna Ilmu di Tengah Krisis Objektivitas Modern. Takuana: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains, Dan Humaniora, 4(3), 436–444. https://doi.org/10.56113/takuana.v4i3.187

License


Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

All published content in Takuana: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains, dan Humaniora is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY NC SA 4.0). This license allows others to share, copy, redistribute, and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, as long as proper credit is given to the original author(s) and source, and any derivative works are distributed under the same license.

Attribution must include a clear citation of the original work and a statement indicating whether any changes were made. Commercial use is not permitted under this license and there is no additional legal or technological restrictions may be applied. For more information about the license terms and permissible use, please refer to the full license text available here.